Home

Blogs - by Date

Blogs - by Issue

Video Library

About

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

Contact


Blog of San Diego
Unfiltered News  based on  Source Documents
An independent, issues-oriented, online news organization

Look it up in the Blog

The most fundamental civil right is the right to honest government.

City Issues


By Issue
By Date
Buy a bank owned property

"The Paperless Way"
Bank Owned - Metro
Bank Owned - Metro Central
Bank Owned - Metro Uptown
Bank Owned - Coastal North
Bank Owned - Coastal South
Bank Owned - North County
Bank Owned - North County Inland
Bank Owned - South Bay
Bank Owned - East County
Bank Owned - Inland East
Bank Owned - Inland South

Register with
"
The Paperless Way"
and receive personalized email updates for Bank Owned Properties.

Law Library

  City Charter
  Municipal Code
  State Constitution
  Brown Act
  CEQA
  Redevelopment Law
  Coastal Act
  Density Bonus Law
  Find a California Law
  Public Records Act
   
 


Budget

 

 
  08/05/09   Mayor Sanders has lost control of City Reform.  
  06/22/09   Will the School Board help build "Moores Folly" - an East Village School/Library?  
  04/14/09   Council imposes "last, best & final" on POA & Local 127.  
         
  08/05/09   Mayor Sanders has lost control of City Reform.  
      by Pat Flannery                                                      top^  
 
Back in 2006 I opposed Proposition C, the ballot measure that allowed the City to employ outside contractors when the Mayor determined, subject to City Council approval, that private parties could provide City services more efficiently and economically than City staff. I believed at the time that it was a cop out (pardon the pun) by Mayor Sanders, who thought that "Managed Competition" would do his reform job for him as City Manager.

Background: the City Council had received a Report from the Mayor's office on July 12, 2006 resulting in the Council passing a "Business Process Reengineering" (BPR) Ordinance as part of the implementation of Prop F, the ballot measure that created the "Strong Mayor" form of government in November 2004.

The Ordinance described BPR as "designed to change practices and procedures in City departments to streamline operations in order to more efficiently and cost effectively deliver services to the citizens of the City". The City Council was very specific: "in order to implement the BPR the Mayor will be required to restructure and reorganize City departments and offices, and to move personnel between such departments and offices".

There is not one mention of Managed Competition in either the BPR Report or the BPR Ordinance. That is important because nothing in the BPR Ordinance required consultation with unions, while Managed Competition required "meet and confer" consultation with the unions. So, the unions set about to create a link. If they could do so they could use California labor laws to impose a veto on BPR. And so it turned out. The whole reform movement has been stalled for over 3 years. As I predicted, the unions used Prop C to strangle BPR at birth and Sanders was not up to the job of countering them. Deep down he was still one of them.

He did not have the foresight or management skills to see it coming. BPR made him the Strong Mayor voters intended, but he allowed the unions to take it right back from him. He was a better politician than City manager. Managed Competition was hailed by his supporters as a hit on the unions. It brought in huge right wing political contributions for his campaign. But that is all it did.

Here is a video of how the unions and their political allies have left Sanders looking like an incompetent bumbler. They are now firmly in charge of "Reform".

Watch how the unions have linked BPR to Managed Competition. As a result the Mayor's entire "Reform City Hall" movement is dying on the vine.

More importantly the taxpayers are stuck with the bill. Sanders allowed the City's employees to acquire a veto. They have taken ownership of the reform process he was elected to implement. They call any ideas for efficiencies and economies their "trade secrets". Instead of a Strong Mayor form of government we got a Strong Union form of government. Sanders handed it to them on a plate.
 

 
  06/22/09   Will the School Board help build "Moores Folly" - an East Village School/Library?  
      by Pat Flannery                                                      top^  
 


Why locate a "Central Library" in this part of town? Because John Moores wants to enhance the attractiveness of the East Village to which he has been given sole development rights by the City of San Diego. Moores agreed to Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) to get his Ballpark built, now the labor unions are pushing to give his development district a Library.

Even the union-controlled School Board has offered to chip in $20 million of its precious Prop-S bond money to help build this "Moores Folly". Its over-compliant legal counsel wrote a convoluted, contradictory legal opinion purporting to justify the pre-payment of 40 years rent on two upper floors for an un-wanted Charter School. This so-called pre-paid rent is nothing more than a cash gift to Moores and is totally inconsistent with any school needs. It is a repeat of the infamous Ballpark deal, a diversion of public money for private use - but with jobs for union labor.

What makes it even worse is that the School Board is behaving like it has the $20 million sitting in its bank account. In its rush to serve a union-friendly developer, it wants to borrow $20 million using "zero coupon" bond financing, the most expensive form of borrowing imaginable.

"Zero coupon" means that a bond issuer pays no interest over a  period of years with principle and accrued interest-on-interest payable at the end. Most Prop-S bond borrowing will be done using this method. The School District has no other choice because the prior Prop MM bonds will not be paid off until 2029 and there are legal limits on annual bond servicing payments in the form of a maximum percentage of assessed valuation (AV). In the case of Prop MM it is $66.67 per $100,000 AV and $60.00 per $100,000 AV for Prop-S.

Thus, Prop MM bond servicing crowds out Prop-S bond servicing until 2029. Even then, because of the annual servicing cap, it is heavily deferred until 2044. The final payment in that year is almost a half billion dollars, mainly interest-on-interest. It may be much worse because this payment schedule is predicated on assessed valuations going up by 5% year-on-year, the reverse of what we know is happening. The truth is that Prop-S bonds are little better than junk bonds, a very poor way to finance school repair, let alone a "Moores Folly" Library.

Borrowing $20 million in these circumstances is like an indulgent parent, who is broke, putting $20,000 on a credit card at 20% in order to buy a wastrel son a sports car he will surely wreck his first night out on the town. If the School Board approves this folly today, it will rank as one of the worst examples of corrupt government in San Diego's sorry history.
 

 
  04/14/09   Council imposes "last, best & final" on POA & Local 127.  
      by Pat Flannery                                                      top^  
 
At 10:45 P.M. this evening the City Council reconvened to impose the Mayor's "last, best and final offer" on the Police Officers' Association (POA) and on the city's blue collar workers' union, AFCSME Local 127.

The Council deferred voting on the tentative agreements reached with MEA, DCAA and Firefighters' Local 145 until Monday April 21, 2009 to allow full details to be worked out.

This means that the whole business of wage agreements went surprisingly smoothly this year. We await publication of the full details.
 
 
Waterfront
Pension
Budget
Most Recent Blogs
General
Mortgage Crisis

Refinance your home


"The Paperless Way"
 

I am an approved broker for all
Government Loans

   


Up to 105% Loan To Value!
No Mortgage Insurance!

Call me at
(619) 600-5845
or email me at pat@patflannery.com
for a free consultation.
 

 

Picking a Realtor

 


With over 32 years full-time experience, right here in San Diego county, there is very little I don't know about Real Estate.

I have never had a lawsuit or an ethics complaint filed against me.  I was trained in the old-school of following "The Golden Rule".

If my Real Estate expertise can be of assistance to you or yours, please email me or call me at (619) 600-5845.

 

 

 

Copyright "Blog of San Diego"  November, 2004 - September, 2010